Digital Procurement Transformation and Diminishing Returns

Digitization vs. Digitalization vs. Digital Transformation

In our earlier posts, we covered digitization and digitalization. We can add digital transformation to this logical sequence as follows. 


So, if we plan to conduct digital transformation, it's OK to consider digitization as the first step, i.e., digitizing legacy processes and automating manual labor and paper-based activities.

We may employ the law of diminishing marginal returns to decide whether to shift to digitalization and digital transformation.

Diminishing marginal returns

It is an economic phenomenon that assumes the incremental output or benefits from an additional unit of input decrease as the quantity of that input increases, while holding all other inputs constant. This concept is often observed in production and investment scenarios.

Here’s an example to illustrate:

Imagine a factory producing widgets. Initially, as the factory hires more workers, widget production increases significantly because many tasks can be done more efficiently with more hands. However, as the factory hires more workers, each new worker contributes less and less to overall production. This happens because the most efficient production capacity has already been used, and additional workers may get in each other's way or run out of equipment, reducing each additional worker's productivity.

Boosting Benefits of Digital Procurement by Transformation

Similarly, at every step of the transformation project, we will reach a point where the incremental benefits of digital procurement start to slow (if not disappear) with new enhancements and investments. That means the potential of extensive development has reached its limit, and we need to look for efficiency boosts with an intensive approach, i.e., shifting over to the next stage - digitalization or digital transformation- to unlock the benefits of process or business model improvements.  

Therefore, we may expect the impact of digital procurement on benefits to look somewhat similar to the following graph.

Value Of Delivery Boost: Progression Vs. Stagnation

P.S. If you appreciate hundreds of hours invested in researching and writing this blog, you can buy me a coffee or subscribe to the membership by following this link. Thank you!

Buy me a coffee

                                          https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ukrsedo

To keep receiving new insights and research, please subscribe here. 




More information on this and other exciting topics can be found in "The Technology Procurement Handbook." It represents 23 years of experience, billions of dollars worth of successful sourcing projects, and 1000s hours spent on research, analysis, and content creation for the most demanding professional readers.
The Technology Procurement Handbook front page
 





 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

The Role of Information Asymmetry in SaaS Negotiations

Image
This post will review a research study  addressing the procurement challenges of the information asymmetry  between buyers and suppliers in digital transformation.   In this scenario, traditional procurement approaches that rely on well-known information about suppliers become inadequate because crucial details are not accessible. Information asymmetry An unequal distribution of information often complicates the traditional buyer-supplier relationship, hindering well-informed decision-making. This challenge intensifies as we enter the digital age, particularly regarding digital procurement objects and software suppliers.  In business and finance, information asymmetry can lead to adverse selection and moral hazard problems.  Adverse selection occurs when buyers need help distinguishing between high-quality and low-quality products or services, leading to a market dominated by lower-quality offerings.  On the other hand, moral hazard aris...
Read more

How to Save 30-50% of the Cloud Software (SaaS) License Cost

Image
100-billion-dollar savings opportunities in technology procurement . Recently, we wrote about the information asymmetry in SaaS negotiations : buyers tend to limit their spending on SaaS due to the need for more knowledge of its fair market price. Still, the SaaS industry is booming and is expected to reach 1 Trillion USD in the early 2030th .   At the same time, industry researchers assume that 30-50% of SaaS licenses are not fully utilized or unused . Even 30% of the 300-350-billion-dollar industry gives us around $ 100 billion annual wastage of SaaS investments, which is a flip side to its ease, flexibility, and speed. However, this blog isn't meant to hail perpetual licenses - it's all about IT procurement. 5 Possible Answers to the Problem Software Asset Management (SAM). When a company purchases software, that license is considered a business asset. As companies depend increasingly on technology to carry out daily business activities, managing these licenses and applicati...
Read more

Procurement Practice #2: Making Sense of the ACV, TCV, and NPV for SaaS Negotiations

Image
This post aims to study SaaS vendors ' tendency to provide ACV offers and suggest an uncommon negotiation argument. The definition and purpose of the ACV ACV, or Annual Contract Value , is a critical metric that shows you how much an ongoing customer contract is worth by averaging and normalizing its value over one year (minus one-time fees, e.g., setup or training.) It's meant to identify recurring revenue and prioritize customer accounts with the most significant revenue potential. It's an alternative to the legacy TCV, or Total Contract Value, which is simply the sum of all annual fees throughout the contract duration. Another obvious benefit of the ACV-based agreement is bringing future revenues forward as you blend projected subscription fees with ongoing ones. For example, a 3-year agreement with annual fees of $150,000 (baseline), $200,000 (year 2,) and $250,000 (year 3) results in an ACV of $200,000 (while the TCV is $600,000, as usual.) That means a customer will ...
Read more