Why Comparing Sales Bonuses to Procurement Savings is Misleading


Sales v Procurement

The comparison—where a $100K sales win gets a $10K bonus, but saving $100K on a procurement contract gets nothing—might seem like a compelling argument for unfairness at first glance. However, this comparison oversimplifies the complex roles of sales and procurement teams. Let’s unpack this misconception from different angles.

Different Objectives and Impact

While it’s tempting to see a $100K sales win and a $100K procurement savings as equivalent financial achievements, their impact on business objectives diverges. Sales teams are revenue-generating and focus on top-line growth—bringing money into the business. A $100K contract directly boosts revenue, essential for business growth, performance metrics, and investor confidence. This tangible addition to revenue is why sales bonuses are usually tied directly to contract wins.

Procurement’s role, however, centers around savings, cost efficiency, and risk management. A $100K savings may not affect revenue but enhances profitability by improving the bottom line. These savings are critical to reducing operational costs and supporting sustainable growth, yet they’re less visible and sometimes undervalued than revenue growth.

Furthermore, procurement contributes beyond financial savings; it mitigates risk, ensures compliance, maintains vendor relationships, and supports continuity in vital yet challenging to quantify ways. The positive effects of these actions often compound over time, impacting profitability and operational stability.

Given these contributions, the question arises: should procurement savings be rewarded comparably to revenue generation or somewhat differently?

Comparing Apples to Apples: Net Profit Margin as a Bridge

Consider using net profit margin as a conversion metric to make savings more comparable to revenue. For example, in digital industries with a 15-25% profit margin, $1 in cost savings equals $4-7 in revenue. This reframing can reveal how substantial procurement savings are when adjusted for margin.

On the sales side, the value of a new contract often extends beyond its immediate value due to potential future contracts and customer lifetime value (LTV). Plus, a portion of each contract’s value is reinvested in customer acquisition costs (CAC), which could be viewed as an efficiency metric similar to savings in procurement and constitute 20-30% of the LTV. This parallel invites the question: can procurement achieve similar efficiency benchmarks if we view CAC as a saving on the sales side?

No Chicken and Egg Problem: Revenue Per Employee vs. Cost Savings Per Employee

When comparing the productivity of these two functions, revenue per employee is often seen as a benchmark in sales. Still, cost savings per employee are not typically highlighted in the financial reporting. 
While revenue growth can be scaled without immediate costs, cost savings inherently involve managing existing expenses. This asymmetry underlines a fundamental truth: while it’s possible to scale revenue independently, cost savings are tied to the revenue, making it harder to scale in isolation.

The Need for Tailored Incentives

The narrative is biased because it compares two distinct functions with different roles, challenges, and time horizons. While sales are rewarded for quick wins and direct revenue impact, procurement teams are often driven by more complex objectives contributing to long-term success. Both teams are essential for business growth, but their incentive structures should reflect their unique contributions and long-term impact.

Instead of comparing bonuses directly, organizations should consider customized recognition programs that reflect the different types of value each team brings. These might include 
  • procurement recognition programs that acknowledge savings, risk management, and strategic sourcing wins.
  • Team-based incentives reward sales and procurement for collaborative wins that drive profitability.
In short, procurement deserves recognition for its critical role in driving sustainable business success—just not in the same way as sales. While both functions are vital to thriving organizations, their achievements, and incentives should be tailored to reflect their distinct roles and impacts.

Follow this blog banner
To keep receiving new insights and research, please subscribe here. 

More information on this and other exciting topics can be found in "The Technology Procurement Handbook." It represents 23 years of experience, billions of dollars worth of successful sourcing projects, and 1000s hours spent on research, analysis, and content creation for the most demanding professional readers.





The Technology Procurement Handbook front page
 

 





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

The Importance of Supply Chain Collaboration

Image
  Why is supply chain collaboration essential? Once, I was asked what makes the supply chain important to a company. Our profession may not be rocket science. Other peers around the company overlap with us in their functions - Technology tends to manage suppliers , Finance owns the demand planning and budgeting , and Sales and Marketing monopolize the end-customer value chain.  These and other colleagues do not always appreciate us; some believe they are even better at our job.  Shadow procurement, supply chain, and logistics have become standards for many companies.  However, some critical differentiators - like collaboration - justify the very existence of our profession!  The supply chain is the most collaborative function in the business.  We find peers everywhere, even behind enemy lines. We welcome any opportunity to form a cross-functional team with anyone who can bring business value through supply chain strategies, sales  and operations pl...
Read more

The National Program of IT as the Alter-Ego of Procurement

Image
" One of the worst and most expensive contracting fiascos in the history of the public sector ." Some real-life cases only require a little reflection to understand that the project was predefined for failure well before its launch. Can we make appropriate conclusions to prevent that from happening again?  The first step is to deepen our study of such cases beyond populistic cliches.    NHS IT System (2001-2011) The national program for IT in the health service is the largest civilian computer project in the world. It was spawned in late 2001 and early 2002.  A far-reaching vision set out a program to transform people's healthcare experiences. Hospital admissions and appointments would be booked online—the choose-and-book system. Pharmacists would no longer struggle with GPs' indecipherable handwriting, and drug prescriptions would be handled electronically. Politicians set the duration of the program at two years and nine months from April 2003 until December 2005...
Read more

My Q&A on Agility for "Trusted Magazine" (December 2023)

Image
The source link . How could you describe your career path in a few words?   I worked in procurement for 22 years - telecom, airline, railways, public infrastructure services and consulting industries, and multiple geographies. I’m a Fellow of CIPS and an author of “ The Technology Procurement Handbook ,” where I tried to share my passion for what we used to call “IT Procurement.” This is where I started digging deeper into the Agile agenda , thinking of finding repercussions with our professional life and blogging on related topics.      How do you think agile practices have transformed companies over the past two years?   I assume that Agile practices in procurement are hyped more than used : many companies still mandate the use of the RFx as the sole answer to any emerging sourcing requirement, many fear or don’t appreciate the demand management, and digital transformation frequently happens without any comprehensive strategy and benefits trac...
Read more